ÃéÜííïò Ðáðáíôùíßïõ
   search

Ãñáöåßï Ôýðïõ

Ðñüóöáôåò Êáôá÷ùñÞóåéò |Áñ÷åßï

Áñ÷åßï: 2015

19 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2015
The Greek Time Bomb
Éóôïóåëßäá «Project-Syndicate»

19 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2015
H ÅëëçíéêÞ ÙñïëïãéáêÞ Âüìâá
Éóôïóåëßäá «Project-Syndicate»

11 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2015
ÅêëïãÝò: Êßíäõíïé êáé åðéëïãÝò
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

Áñ÷åßï: 2014

8 Éïõíßïõ 2014
The Periphery¢s Purgatory

3 Éïõíßïõ 2014
ON THE STATE OF THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP

Áñ÷åßï: 2013

6 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2013
The Re-Division of Europe
Éóôïóåëßäá «Project-Syndicate»

21 Áõãïýóôïõ 2013
The Eurozone¢s Misplaced Orthodoxies

12 Éïõíßïõ 2013
Bismarck versus Bismarck

29 Ìáúïõ 2013
The German Question Revisited

25 Áðñéëßïõ 2013
I Brought the Euro to Greece

4 Áðñéëßïõ 2013
Europe¢s Perpetual Crisis

6 Ìáñôßïõ 2013
A Global “New Deal”?

15 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2013
Greece and the Euro

21 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2013
Globalization¢s European Test

Áñ÷åßï: 2012

1 Éïõíßïõ 2012
Greece¢s Catharsis?

9 Ìáúïõ 2012
Steering Clear of the Euro Precipice

3 Ìáúïõ 2012
Ç ÅëëÜäá óôç ÌÜ÷ç ôçò Åõñþðçò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

Áñ÷åßï: 2011

16 Íïåìâñßïõ 2011
Ôåëåõôáßá Åõêáéñßá;
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

9 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2011
ÁíÜêôçóç ôçò ÷áìÝíçò åìðéóôïóýíçò ãéá íá ìåßíïõìå óôï åõñþ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

4 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2011
Ãéá íá Ìåßíïõìå óôï Åõñþ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

22 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2011
Decision time for the eurozone - Project Syndicate

24 Áðñéëßïõ 2011
Ç EëëÜäá óå êñßóç: õðÜñ÷åé äéÝîïäïò;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊáèçìåñéíÞ»

19 Áðñéëßïõ 2011
Ç EëëÜäá óå Êñßóç: ÕðÜñ÷åé ÄéÝîïäïò;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊáèçìåñéíÞ»

3 Ìáñôßïõ 2011
AÃÉÏÃÑÁÖÉÅÓ ÓêÜëåò
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

10 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2011
Policy prescriptions for curing -eurozonitis-

7 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2011
×ÑÇÌÁÔÉÓÔÇÑÉO 1999-2000

17 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2011
Ç Ðáãêïóìéïðïßçóç óå Êñßóç
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

Áñ÷åßï: 2010

26 Éïõíßïõ 2010
Ïé äéáñèñùôéêÝò áëëáãÝò èá ôïíþóïõí ôçí ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

20 Éïõíßïõ 2010
ÊËÅÉÄÉ ÃÉÁ ÅÎÏÄÏ ÁÐÏ ÔÇÍ ÊÑÉÓÇ ÏÉ ÌÅÔÁÑÑÕÈÌÉÓÅÉÓ
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

26 Ìáñôßïõ 2010
Êñßóç êáé ÁíÜêáìøç
Ðåñéïäéêü «Ìåôáññýèìéóç»

4 Ìáñôßïõ 2010
ÁÑÈÑÏ ÓÔÇÍ ÇËÅÊÔÑÏÍÉÊÇ ÅÖÇÌÅÑÉÄÁ NEWSIT

3 Ìáñôßïõ 2010
ÄÞëùóç óôçí åöçìåñßäá Ôï Âçìá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

18 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2010
Êñßóéìåò ¿ñåò
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

18 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2010
Ïéêïíïìßá:Êñßóéìåò ÅðéëïãÝò
Ðåñéïäéêü «ÅÐÉÊÁÉÑÁ»

10 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2010
ÅëëçíéêÞ Ïéêïíïìßá:¸îïäïò áðü ôçí êñßóç
Ðåñéïäéêü «FORUM»

9 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2010
ÙÑÁ ÁÍÁÄÉÐËÙÓÇÓ ÓÔÇÍ ÏÉÊÏÍÏÌÉÊÇ ÐÏËÉÔÉÊÇ
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

Áñ÷åßï: 2009

12 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2009
Ìåßùóç ôïõ åëëåßììáôïò ôï 2010 óôï 8% ôïõ ÁÅÐ
Åöçìåñßäá «Ï Êüóìïò ôïõ ÅðåíäõôÞ»

9 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2009
ÅëëÜäá êáé Êñßóç: ÁíÜêáìøç Þ Ïðéóèïäñüìçóç;
Åöçìåñßäá «Áîßá»

1 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2009
Ïéêïíïìßá: Êñßóç êáé ÐñïïðôéêÝò
Ðåñéïäéêü «Äçìüóéïò ÔïìÝáò»

26 Íïåìâñßïõ 2009
ÁíÜêáìøç Þ Óôáóéìüôçôá;
Ðåñéïäéêü «The Economist»

15 Íïåìâñßïõ 2009
Êéíäõíïé êáé ÐñïïðôéêÝò ãéá ôçí Ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

1 Íïåìâñßïõ 2009
ÌåôÜ ôéò ÂñõîÝëëåò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

26 Éïõëßïõ 2009
ÓôñáâÜ Áñìåíßæïõìå
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

4 Éïõëßïõ 2009
«ÅëëÜäá: Êñßóç êáé ÐñïïðôéêÞ»
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

21 Éïõíßïõ 2009
¿ñá ÁðïöÜóåùí
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

29 Áðñéëßïõ 2009
Ðáãêüóìéá Êñßóç êáé ÅëëÜäá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

7 Áðñéëßïõ 2009
«ÍÝá ÔÜîç» êáé ÅëëÜäá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

15 Ìáñôßïõ 2009
¸ëëåéììá Óõíáßíåóçò, Þ Çãåóßáò ;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

15 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2009
Ãéá Ýíá ÍÝï Åêóõã÷ñïíéóìü
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊõñéáêÜôéêç Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

15 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2009
Êéíäõíåýåé ôï Åõñþ;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

14 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2009
Êñßóç êáé êçäåìïíßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

24 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2009
ÔÝóóåñá ðñïáðáéôïýìåíá ãéá åðéóôñïöÞ óôçí áíÜðôõîç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

18 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2009
Ôï êáëü ôïõ ôüðïõ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

Áñ÷åßï: 2008

17 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2008
ÊïéíùíéêÞ ÅîÝãåñóç êáé Ïéêïíïìéêïß Êßíäõíïé
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

22 Íïåìâñßïõ 2008
Ãéá ôçí ¸îïäï áðü ôçí Êñßóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

20 Íïåìâñßïõ 2008
Óþñåõóç Êéíäýíùí
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

5 Íïåìâñßïõ 2008
ÏìðÜìá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

29 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2008
Ç ¿ñá ôçò ÊåíôñïáñéóôåñÜò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

16 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2008
ÌáèÞìáôá áðü ôçí Êñßóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

10 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2008
ÊñÜôïò êáé Ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

6 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2008
Êñßóç êáé ÅêëïãÝò
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

24 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2008
ÁðÜíôçóç óôçí Êñßóç
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

17 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2008
Ïéêïíïìßá êáé Áîéïðéóôßá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

10 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2008
Ðñüêëçóç Íßêçò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

3 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2008
Êñßóç ÐïëéôéêÞò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

27 Áõãïýóôïõ 2008
ÍÝåò ÐñïêëÞóåéò ãéá ôçí Ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

26 Áõãïýóôïõ 2008
3ç ÓåðôÝìâñç
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

29 Éïõëßïõ 2008
Ìåôáññõèìßóåéò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

22 Éïõëßïõ 2008
ÄéÝîïäïò óôçí Êñßóç
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

16 Éïõëßïõ 2008
Ç Åõñþðç óå Õðï÷þñçóç
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

9 Éïõëßïõ 2008
ÏõÜóéãêôïí, Éïýëéïò 08
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

1 Éïõëßïõ 2008
ÄéåèíÞò Êñßóç êáé ÐïëéôéêÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

24 Éïõíßïõ 2008
ÐïëéôéêÞ ÁëëáãÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

18 Éïõíßïõ 2008
H ÐïëéôéêÞ óå Äïêéìáóßá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

11 Éïõíßïõ 2008
Ðñüåäñïò ÏìðÜìá;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

21 Ìáúïõ 2008
×ùñßò Áöïñéóìïýò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

5 Ìáúïõ 2008
Áêñßâåéá êáé Åõñþ
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

15 Áðñéëßïõ 2008
ÄéåèíÞò Êñßóç , Åõñþ êáé ï ñüëïò ôïõ ÊñÜôïõò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊõñéáêÜôéêç Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

27 Ìáñôßïõ 2008
ÄéåèíÞò Êñßóç êáé ç ÅëëÜäá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

Áñ÷åßï: 2007

10 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2007
Ôï Äéáêýâåõìá
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

4 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2007
ÐÁÓÏÊ êáé Ìåôáññõèìßóåéò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊõñéáêÜôéêç Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

20 Éïõíßïõ 2007
Ãéá Ìéá ÐñáãìáôéêÞ Ìåôáññýèìéóç - ÊñÜôïò êáé Ðïëßôçò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

15 Éïõíßïõ 2007
Óôçí Ðñþôç ÃñáììÞ ôçò ÁíÜðôõîçò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

11 Éïõíßïõ 2007
ÐåñéâÜëëïí êáé ÐïëéôéêÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

9 Éïõíßïõ 2007
Ðáãêïóìéïðïßçóç êáé ðñïïäåõôéêÞ ðïëéôéêÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

7 Éïõíßïõ 2007
Ðáãêïóìéïðïßçóç, ïéêïíïìßá ôçò áãïñÜò êáé ðñïïäåõôéêÞ ðïëéôéêÞ
Ðåñéïäéêü «Ìåôáññýèìéóç»

6 Éïõíßïõ 2007
ÐÁÓÏÊ êáé ÅêëïãÝò
Ðåñéïäéêü «ÁÍÔÉ»

18 Ìáúïõ 2007
Ôï Äéáêýâåõìá ôùí Åêëïãþí

25 Áðñéëßïõ 2007
ÌáèÞìáôá áðü ôç Ãáëëßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

3 Áðñéëßïõ 2007
Ôï ÔÝëïò ôçò ÁìåñéêáíéêÞò Ìïíïêñáôïñßáò;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

28 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2007
ÁñéóôåñÜ êáé Ìåôáññõèìßóåéò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

1 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2007
Ãéá ¸íá ÍÝï Êýêëï Ìåôáññõèìßóåùí
Ðåñéïäéêü «Ìåôáññýèìéóç»

Áñ÷åßï: 2006

29 Íïåìâñßïõ 2006
ÁëëáãÞ óôçí Ðáéäåßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

24 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2006
ÌåôÜ ôéò åêëïãÝò, ôé;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊõñéáêÜôéêç Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

18 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2006
Ïéêïíïìßá : Ç ÍÝá Ðñüêëçóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

4 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2006
Êáôåõèýíóåéò ãéá ôçí ÁíÜðôõîç ôçò ÅëëçíéêÞò Ïéêïíïìßáò
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

10 Áõãïýóôïõ 2006
Ó÷üëéï Ñé÷Üñäïõ Óùìåñßôç óôç Íôüúôóå ÂÝëëå: Ç ðåñßðôùóç Ðáðáíôùíßïõ

5 Éïõëßïõ 2006
Ãéá ìéá ÓôñáôçãéêÞ ôçò ÁñéóôåñÜò óôçí Åõñþðç
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

3 Éïõëßïõ 2006
Ðüñïé ãéá ôçí ÁíÜðôõîç êáé ôçí ÊïéíùíéêÞ Óõíï÷Þ
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

15 Ìáúïõ 2006
ãéá ôïí ÁíäñÝá ÐáðáíäñÝïõ

25 Áðñéëßïõ 2006
To: Ôhe Editor of the Financial Times

16 Áðñéëßïõ 2006
Ï êüóìïò ôñÝ÷åé. Ç ÅëëÜäá ;
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊõñéáêÜôéêç Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

10 Ìáñôßïõ 2006
Ôï åðüìåíï âÞìá
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

9 Ìáñôßïõ 2006
Ôï ÐÁÓÏÊ áíáêÜìðôåé êáé óôçí ðñüèåóç øÞöïõ Ý÷åé ìçäåíßóåé ôç äéáöïñÜ ìå ôç ÍÄ ...
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

17 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2006
Ç ÁëÞèåéá ãéá ôçí Ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

Áñ÷åßï: 2005

20 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2005
ÁíÜðôõîç êáé Áðáó÷üëçóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

17 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2005
Ãéá Ýíá ÍÝï Åõñùðáúêü Îåêßíçìá
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

1 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2005
Ðïõ ÐÜåé ôï ÐÁÓÏÊ;
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò»

1 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2005
Ïéêïíïìßá, ÁíÜðôõîç êáé Ìåôáññõèìßóåéò
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

16 Éïõíßïõ 2005
Ïé ðïëéôéêÝò ðñïûðïèÝóåéò ôùí ìåôáññõèìßóåùí
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

9 Éïõíßïõ 2005
ÄéáñèñùôéêÝò ÁëëáãÝò : Í.Ä. êáé ÐÁÓÏÊ

1 Éïõíßïõ 2005
Ïé ðïëéôéêÝò ðñïûðïèÝóåéò ôùí ìåôáññõèìßóåùí
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá ôïõ ÓáââÜôïõ»

22 Ìáúïõ 2005
Êé üìùò ÷ñåéáæüìáóôå Ýíá íÝï êýìá åêóõã÷ñïíéóìïý
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

22 Áðñéëßïõ 2005
Ç ÓõíôáãìáôéêÞ ÓõíèÞêç êáé ï Ñüëïò ôçò ÅõñùðáúêÞò ¸íùóçò óôçí Ðáãêüóìéá ÄéáêõâÝñíçóç

17 Áðñéëßïõ 2005
Ìåôáîý Åõñþðçò êáé ÁìåñéêÞò: Ç ÄåîéÜ ÅðéëïãÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «ÂÞìá ôçò ÊõñéáêÞò»

2 Áðñéëßïõ 2005
Ç ÅõñùðáúêÞ ÅêôñïðÞ ôçò Í.Ä.
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

26 Ìáñôßïõ 2005
EõñùðáúêÞ Åíïðïßçóç êáé ÓõíôáãìáôéêÞ ÓõíèÞêç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

13 Ìáñôßïõ 2005
Ïéêïíïìßá : ¸íáò ÷ñüíïò ÍÝáò Äçìïêñáôßáò

24 Öåâñïõáñßïõ 2005
ÐñïÝ÷åé ôï èÝìá ôçò ïéêïíïìßáò ...
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊáèçìåñéíÞ»

25 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2005
ÐÁÓÏÊ: Ïé ðñïêëÞóåéò ôçò ÍÝáò Åðï÷Þò
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

12 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2005
ÁðÜíôçóç óôçí åñþôçóç ôçò ÇÌÅÑÇÓÉÁÓ

1 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2005
Ïéêïíïìßá : ÍÝåò ÐñïêëÞóåéò
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

Áñ÷åßï: 2004

19 Íïåìâñßïõ 2004
ÐÁÓÏÊ êáé Óõíáóðéóìüò
Åöçìåñßäá «¸èíïò»

10 Íïåìâñßïõ 2004
ÅîùôåñéêÞ ÐïëéôéêÞ ÷ùñßò Ðõîßäá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

9 Íïåìâñßïõ 2004
Óêüðéá êáé ÅëëçíéêÞ ÐïëéôéêÞ óôá ÂáëêÜíéá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

5 Íïåìâñßïõ 2004
ÄÞëùóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôï ÂÞìá»

1 Ïêôùâñßïõ 2004
ÄÞëùóç
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

20 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2004
Áíåýèõíåò Åîáããåëßåò
Åöçìåñßäá «Åëåõèåñïôõðßá»

2 Óåðôåìâñßïõ 2004
Ãéá ìéá ÐïéïôéêÞ ÁíÜðôõîç
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

14 Áõãïýóôïõ 2004
Íá áíáäåßîïõìå íÝá áíôáãùíéóôéêÜ ðëåïíåêôÞìáôá
Åöçìåñßäá «Çìåñçóßá»

29 Éïõíßïõ 2004
ÐÁÓÏK: ÅðéóôñïöÞ óôçí ÐïëéôéêÞ
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

30 Ìáúïõ 2004
Ç Óýíïäïò KïñõöÞò ôïõ ÍÁÔÏ êáé ç Ðáãêüóìéá Áñ÷éôåêôïíéêÞ ÁóöÜëåéáò
Åöçìåñßäá «ÊáèçìåñéíÞ»

21 Ìáúïõ 2004
Ïé ÅõñùåêëïãÝò êáé ï Ñüëïò ôçò ÁñéóôåñÜò

10 Ìáúïõ 2004
Ç ÁëÞèåéá ãéá ôçí Ïéêïíïìßá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

1 Ìáúïõ 2004
Ï åêóõã÷ñïíéóìüò ôùí Åíüðëùí ÄõíÜìåùí êáé ç õëïðïßçóç ôùí åîïðëéóôéêþí ðñïãñáììÜôùí

21 Áðñéëßïõ 2004
ÌåôÜ ôï ÄçìïøÞöéóìá
Åöçìåñßäá «Ôá ÍÝá»

8 Áðñéëßïõ 2004
Íáé Þ ¼÷é óôï Ó÷Ýäéï ÁíÜí êáé ãéáôß

3 Éïõíßïõ 2014,
ON THE STATE OF THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP


Transatlantic relations continue to play a significant role in global economics and politics, despite the restructuring of the world order that has taken place following the end of the Cold War. The present balance of geopolitical power in the global economy shows a distinct superiority of the Atlantic partners in terms of size and strength — both economic and military.

The combined weight of the United States and the European Union in world GDP, although falling, still reaches 45 percent. The key emerging superpowers — China, Brazil, India and Russia — add up to close to 20 percent. Japan is not included in either camp. Similar differences persist in defense budgets despite the limited European contribution. However the trends in the next couple of decades play out, the predominance of the West is unlikely to be seriously affected so far as the measured indices are concerned. Qualitative factors, in particular the economic vitality, social inclusiveness and cultural appeal of the Atlantic powers, may exert greater weight on the future course of the competition for global influence between the West and the Rest.

In recent years, the reputation of Western economics has been severely damaged by the global financial crash, while the eurozone is facing unprecedented financial and political strains and the United States¢ political system shows signs of dysfunction, reflecting deeper social divisions.

Against this background, two developments stand out in 2013 so far as the transatlantic relations are concerned.

First, the growing difficulties encountered by President Barack Obama in overcoming Congressional opposition to implementing his second-term agenda. The specter of a lame-duck President is limiting the scope for substantial initiatives in either domestic or foreign fields which might help restore the West¢s leading power. Such initiatives would include the speedy implementation of the trade liberalization pacts with the EU and the Pacific powers — the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTTP
and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) — global financial reform, and development assistance policies in line with the Millennium Development Goals, as well as more effective intervention in resolving problems affecting global or regional security, such as the Arab-Israeli conflict, Iran¢s nuclear program and Syria¢s civil war.

Second, Angela Merkel¢s triumphant reelection for a third term as German Chancellor and the creation of a grand coalition government. This development helps to confirm German supremacy within the EU while also making likely that the eurozone will persist in applying intergovernmentalism and incrementalism in addressing Europe¢s economic and political weaknesses. This, in turn, would reflect Germany¢s selfcentered approach, consisting in promoting narrow national interests and retaining control over economic policies, both at home and — thanks to its preeminent position — in the monetary union as a whole.

So long as Germany and the other countries of the eurozone¢s core continue to block significant moves to economic and political integration and also insist on the universal pursuit of austerity policies, the monetary union is unlikely to escape from its present stagnation and growing internal disparities, notably between the North and the South.

Developments in 2014 should be viewed within the context indicated by the above remarks. No elections are expected to take place — barring unforeseen events — in any major country that forms part of the Atlantic community, with the exception of the U.S. mid-terms for Congress. Domestic politics will tend to follow established patterns. The U.S. economic recovery is likely to gradually gather pace while the eurozone¢s core economies will also start to move out from the recession, albeit in a hesitant way partly owing to constraints posed by restrictive fiscal policies and undercapitalization of the banks. In peripheral economies output fall seems to have hit the bottom, but recovery will be limited, with Italy and Greece also facing social tensions and political uncertainties.

In the international field, no major development is in sight. Trade negotiations in the framework of TTIP and TPP will proceed at a slow pace while progress in other areas such as financial reform and development assistance will be limited. Europe¢s banking union will enter the first stage of implementation, marking a step in rationalizing the eurozone¢s system of economic governance. However, the step is a timid one as extensive powers will be retained by national supervisors.

Transatlantic cooperation in resolving global or regional conflicts will continue, as in the past, constrained by domestic resistance to foreign intervention and Europe¢s overall weakness and political fragmentation. Domestic factors prevented President Obama from acting more decisively against Syria¢s use of chemical weapons allowing Russia to emerge as a fair international arbiter. Parliamentary opposition cancelled the U.K. government¢s intention to join forces in the planned action. France was left out in the cold waiting for guidance from the United States. Germany consistently refrains from taking or joining military initiatives in the international field, wary of domestic controversy and constitutional restrictions. Though public rhetoric on the subject is evolving in a positive direction, perceptible changes in attitude are unlikely. Weak European military budgets are further curtailed by recession and fiscal austerity and, together with political disunity, underline EU¢s foreign policy impotence. France, by consistently showing decisiveness in deploying forces abroad in association with the U.S., looks like the exception that proves the rule.

The overall picture is not a happy one. The transatlantic relationship falls far short of exhausting its potential for cooperation and related synergies, and displaying its leadership capabilities. International economic coordination is stumbling while global or regional security problems get less attention than they deserve and are, thus, allowed to eventually produce threats for stability and peace. Relations with China and Russia are also left relatively unattended as the U.S. “pivot,” or rebalance, to Asia is proceeding slowly and the “reset” with Russia failed to lead to meaningful results — stretching beyond Dmitry Medvedev¢s presidential term — while European policies towards these two superpowers are guided more by economic than by political considerations.

2014 looked as if it would not produce game-changing events in the transatlantic space. However, history has a tendency to outsmart political analysts, in much the same way as economists are often proven wrong in their predictions, and the Ukraine crisis may yet serve this role.

Bosch Public Policy Fellow, 2013–2014 Liberal Order
in a Post-Western World

  Âéïãñáöéêü Óçìåßùìá / CV